Home of the Quantum Ogre, Agency, Theory, and Fun
Less than 48 hours left! Don't miss out!
I know explaining it doesn't do it, sometimes. So let me show you.
For context:
The manon, the grid, the world of cybertechtronic reality.
Nobody is getting a pizza while the Agonarch and the decker sit alone and play the game.
Putting heat aside for a moment, moving everything onto the same battlefield instantly makes asymetric tactically interesting terrain. Yes, it's a standard corporate floor plan, but if the Network Access Node is behind that door, and there's two mages sitting in the middle of a ley line on the second floor, those are tactically relevant goals. Since these objects dramatically improve the utility of those who use them, even a wild random assortment will create emergent tactical situations.
So if it's just a question of standing there shooting at targets, it becomes kind of tedious. Once you're discovered, well, you're on a clock. I'm not a particularly big fan of clocks. I think they are kind of disingenuous. After all, does 'delaying' a real clock change the time? This not a serious comment, but my skepticism about their overuse.
Heat is triggered by action, but the results of heat are almost certainly going to cause heat to raise. Let's step through the following stages.
at zero heat, you're still in the alert/infiltration portion of the operation. It provides no modifiers or disruption.
Heat rises to one if you pop alert, or if you are identified as an outsider or seen performing a suspicious activity.
The result of this happening is a AR sensor drone is deployed at your location and security personnel are sent to your location.
A gun being fired immediately raises the heat to two. If you're confronted or identified by the guards, heat rises to two. If the sensor drone is destroyed or you engage in suspicious activity visible to it, heat rises to two.
When heat rises to two stars all intruder responses are activated, and all personnel converge on your location. At this point, the intrusion is considered a crime and has a 50/50 shot of raising the heat in the sector during fallout.
Also: During this heat level, all player tests get a free bonus die.
Any kind of explosion or escalation in response raises the heat to three.
Peaceful resolutions are, in most cases, off the table. The entire facility is notified and attempts to stop or eliminate you. Heat will rise by one in the sector during fallout.
Also: At three stars of heat or above, the target number drops. Three on veteran, four on professional, and five on prime.
Finally, any death or significant loss, or an engagement that doesn't end within two rounds raises the heat to four.
At this point, containment and responses have failed. High threat response teams are notified and will arrive in 2d6 rounds.
Also: All characters gain an extra action.
It's important to note, that these are not necessarily sequential. If an explosion goes off during infiltration, heat rises immediately to three.
Once heat begins, they have to accomplish all the goals they have left on a very short clock. There are, very simply, too many things to do in too short a time.
So, you can see, within the context of these limits, emergent gameplay goals abound. Somebody has to do something about those two mages on the leyline right now or things are going to go to hell, and you can't move on because the decker needs to open a door, but he's pinned down by a pair of AR ICE constructs. And a robot dog with a rocket launcher on it's back just slid into the other end of the hall. And do we even have a location on the target yet?
Everyone is playing as a team, on the same board, in the same battle as time runs out.
Actions are resolved very quickly. . . the choices not so much. But the outcomes and risks of those choices are immediately clear to the players. The math is simple, and, oh man. Do I really only have four dice left in my finesse pool to dodge?
One final thing. You may have noted I started this by talking about how all life is life, and we're going to have to deal with things that are not us. Here's an open secret—there's no difference between the green and the blighted and humans. They are all just humans. Synths are indistinguishable from life and they reside in things like autocannons and drones. Humans are people working jobs. Dogs and animals are uplifted, being attacked by a dog is terrifying, but when he's also saying "I'm gonna tear your fucking throat out", I mean, what are you, some kind of cop dog killer?
Deodands hunt people, yet have speech. Is something that exists solely to hunt humans worthy of life?
I told you it wasn't an action game. It isn't just retrofuturism. It's cyberpunk.
I mean, sounds like a good time, right?
Hot take, but the actual straight tactical gameplay in modern games (Dungeons & Dragons, Pathfinder, et. al.) is fairly dull.
It ends up being not that big a deal, because of the tactical infinity involved. You can literally think outside the box. That's not a drawback—the dullness. But there are certain instances where someone thought it was fun to give opponents 400 hit points and attacks that do an average of 8.5 damage. In a disassociated ruleset that nullifies all the tactical infinity options, no less.
The early 2000's were a wild time.
It makes me think, you know, now that we are seeing so much content from people, that the vast majority of it is, well, pretty derivative and mid. That isn't an insult. It's a statistical necessity.
Is it ok, even allowed, to say the very basic fact that there are organic limitations to life? For example, I do not possess the ability to process oxygen from water, whereas a fish does. This is something that is very disturbing to think about.
All life is related. If you go back far enough we have a common ancestor with every creature that walks, lives, or crawls. We've developed different capabilities, but the divisions, our divisions, are artificial. They are not objective. They are decided by learned people in the field of taxonomy.
And we don't always agree which animal belongs where. It's not clear. Because every single creature is a unique soup, patterned, but varied, by its parents to better take advantage of its environment.
And they are all you. All life is you.
I've got a lot on my mind.
Did you know you can have two contradictory thoughts at the same time? Or that there is no other single human on the planet that shares your thoughts and beliefs?
I'm doubly affected—a symptom of my mental illness is, uh, the diagnostic manual calls it "Have flat emotions or have emotional responses that are limited or not proper socially."
Well, I can tell you, that it's because both my awareness and concern about what other people think is a huge fucking goose egg. When I learned about peer culture, I thought it was a lie.
I did think about it in terms of violence, of course.
I keep getting these people accusing me of using AI to produce my drawings. I've got nothing against AI art, or AI products. But I drew all the pictures for Sinless by hand. They are in the same style I've been drawing in for the last thirty years. He asked where he could find more of my work. I told him to start with the mural I painted in Kimple Hall at the University of Arkansas and then work his way forward through my career from there.
The thing is, it doesn't have to do with the work. The words of the accusation are just noise. I'm not saying it's 'non-cognitivism'. I'm saying it's a call. A trumpet, or a song. An identity vocalization. And the call, it's just, not new.
Back in 2010, I had people accusing me of using map programs to draw my maps. The ones I drew live on twitch for Megadungeon.
I've read a lot of discourse about AI art. All I will personally say about my thoughts is this: "As a working artist I'm worried not at all". I'm certain everyone will draw their own conclusions and they will certainly be wrong. Knock yourself out.
If you're reading a conversation between people you know about AI, it's two people arguing about stuff they made up. It's the same with the abortion debate, gun control, or literally any other topic. If you're opening your mouth in public, you only express two things. Your complete and total ignorance of any of the reality of the issues at hand, and how important you've decided those issues are to how you think about yourself.
The fact that you are given these areas to confine yourself to and discuss among yourself is a system of regulation. Some might call that regulation control, or an exploitation of the traits of an organism. Say, a trait concerned about in-group/out-group dynamics and belonging and feeling.
Did you know some people have their corneas removed and can see in the ultraviolet spectrum? With their jelly vision-spheres? Did you ever spent time around another animal, and they just compulsively engage in a behavior that you have no direct frame of reference for? And you see them engaging in the behavior over and over, with no insight into their internal state?
It might be enough to drive a person mad.
The thing is, I see something different. I wrote a whole game about it (and ahda ahda he's on about the game again.) The use of religious imagery isn't accidental.
There is more than enough for everyone.
There's enough money.
There's enough food.
There's enough space.
There's technology available to manufacture and distribute anything we need anywhere on the planet.
The only reason things aren't better is because we decided.
Well, I mean, you decided.
Because, you know, for most people. Fixing the problems is less important than winning. And besides, if the problems were fixed, things might change for you. You might have to change or grow. You might feel diminished when faced with your own private experience being part of a planet among billions of suns among trillions of galaxies flowing in a river across the heavens.
I don't understand that. I can't win. I can't lose. I can't even feel a response to the opinions of other people. I'm not better or worse than anyone else—within my own sphere I'm struggling to do the best that I can.
Did you know people build lightsabers? It's an almost impossible engineering problem, and of net negative utility. But someone showed them something novel. Something new. And once they saw it, there was no obstacle that existed that would prevent the human organism from making it. It was dreamed into existence.
We live in a heaven or hell of our own making. And I guess I'm here for the show.
In the meanwhile, I'm going to imagine making better futures.
You want to play the game that uses these.
Sinless: Billionaire Bounty is live.
It's good.
It's good mechanically, it's good visually, it's good stylistically. When people look at it they say, "This is good!". Often say say, "Holy crap the art is amazing".
This is something to be used.
If you want to play cyberpunk in a living city, fighting over resources in sectors? Check it out.
If you like a game that's not about 'creating a build' but making a lot of dynamic choices? Check it out.
If you like west marches open table games, that's exactly what it's for.
 |
| One of over 120 assets. |
It's a true cyberpunk game, not a jingoistic action game.
It completely obliviates problems with action economies, tracking bullshit, and character 'builds'. It uses simple mechanics and limited resources to let everyone at the table know the odds for a collection of interesting choices. And it still lets you shop for meaningful gear.
It has an integrated game loop—and all that piece of jargon means— is the game considers the outcomes of play. No figuring out how much to pay on a mission, or having to ad hoc responses from the city to a building being blown up. Agonarchs don't have to figure out how to run the game. They can instead just play the game.
It's a game made for intelligent people who want a game that treats them that way. A game you can play together, and everyone discovers novel things.
It is the best thing I have done in my career to date.
(Why doesn't he write about design any more? Because I'm busy making the best game you'll ever play. There wasn't anything else to say. I had to put up or shut up; so check it out.)
